"Ultra-processed foods" (UPFs) have become one of the biggest nutrition topics of recent years. Headlines warn they're killing us. Books call them "Frankenfoods." Others say the whole concept is overblown fear-mongering.
As usual, the truth is more nuanced than either extreme. Here's what the science actually says.
What Makes Something "Ultra-Processed"?
The term comes from the NOVA classification system, developed by Brazilian researchers. It divides all food into four groups:
| Group | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Unprocessed | Natural foods with minimal alteration | Fresh fruit, vegetables, eggs, plain meat, fish |
| 2. Processed Culinary | Ingredients used in cooking | Olive oil, butter, salt, sugar, flour |
| 3. Processed Foods | Group 1 + Group 2 combined | Cheese, canned vegetables, smoked fish, fresh bread |
| 4. Ultra-Processed | Industrial formulations with many additives | Soft drinks, chicken nuggets, instant noodles, most packaged snacks |
The key distinguisher for UPFs isn't just processing (cheese is processed). It's the presence of ingredients you wouldn't find in a home kitchen: high-fructose corn syrup, modified starches, hydrogenated oils, flavour enhancers, emulsifiers, and so on.
📋 The Quick Test
Read the ingredients. If there are substances you can't buy as a normal consumer, or more than 5-10 ingredients you don't recognise, it's probably ultra-processed.
What the Research Actually Shows
Let's be clear about what the evidence supports and where it's weaker:
Strong Evidence:
- High UPF diets correlate with obesity - Consistently shown across multiple studies and populations
- UPFs are often easier to overconsume - They're designed to be highly palatable and often lack satiety signals
- People eating high-UPF diets tend to have poorer overall nutrition - Less fibre, more sugar, fewer micronutrients
Moderate Evidence:
- Associations with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes - Observed in observational studies, but could be confounded by overall diet quality
- Possible links to gut health issues - Some emulsifiers may affect gut microbiome, but research is early
Weaker/Uncertain Evidence:
- Specific harms from individual additives - Most approved additives haven't shown harm at typical consumption levels
- Causation vs correlation - People who eat lots of UPFs often have other unhealthy habits; hard to isolate UPF effect
📚 Key Study
A landmark 2019 study in Cell Metabolism (Hall et al.) found that people given unlimited access to ultra-processed meals ate 500 more calories per day than those given unprocessed meals of matched nutrition. This suggests UPFs may drive overconsumption independent of their nutrient content.
The Nuance That Headlines Miss
Not All UPFs Are Equal
The NOVA system is a blunt instrument. It puts protein powder, mass-produced sliced bread, and sugary breakfast cereals in the same category. Clearly, these aren't equivalent health-wise.
Some UPFs (fortified cereals, plant milks, protein supplements) may actually improve diets for some people. The category is too broad for blanket "avoid all UPF" advice.
Similarly, some "unprocessed" eating patterns (eating raw everything, for example) aren't necessarily healthier. Cooking is processing. Fermentation is processing. Much of what makes food safe and nutritious involves some processing.
Why UPFs Are So Common
Understanding why helps explain the complexity:
- Convenience - Long shelf life, ready-to-eat, no prep required
- Cost - Industrial production is cheaper than artisan methods
- Taste engineering - Formulated for maximum palatability
- Consistency - Always tastes the same, anywhere in the country
- Marketing - Heavily advertised, prominently displayed
These aren't sinister forces. They're market responses to real consumer desires: busy people want convenient, affordable, tasty food. The problem is when UPFs become the default rather than the exception.
Practical Guidance
Based on current evidence, a reasonable approach:
- Don't panic about occasional UPFs - Having some in your diet isn't going to harm you
- Make them the exception, not the rule - Most of your meals should be based on minimally processed ingredients
- Focus on the obvious problems first - Sugary drinks, snacks, heavily processed meats are the clearest concerns
- Read ingredients, not just nutrition labels - The ingredient list tells you more about processing level than calorie counts
- Don't replace UPFs with diet products - "Low-fat" and "sugar-free" versions are often more processed, not less
🎯 The Sensible Middle Ground
Ultra-processed foods probably aren't the sole cause of modern health problems, but they're also not harmless. A diet based mostly on real food, cooked at home (or by actual chefs), with UPFs as occasional convenience items, is almost certainly healthier than the reverse.
Where Do Ready Meals Fit?
This is where it gets relevant to us. Are ready meals ultra-processed?
Some are. Some aren't.
A supermarket ready meal with 30+ ingredients including maltodextrin, modified starch, and flavour enhancers? That's clearly UPF.
A chef-prepared meal using chicken, vegetables, olive oil, herbs, and stock? That's closer to "processed food" (NOVA Group 3) - the same category as homemade soup.
The difference isn't whether it's pre-made - it's how it's made. Check the ingredients. If they're things you'd use at home, the processing level is fundamentally different from industrial formulations.
← Back to Food Quality guides